|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Citizen
Survey |
Q601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If
something bad happened to you, do you think you would get justice? |
Women |
n |
Men |
n |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
73.4% |
609 |
63.5% |
591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Citizen Survey |
Q501 |
Q301 |
Q201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Have never
used |
Formal court |
Village court |
Shalish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Women |
97% |
100% |
89% |
|
609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Men |
85% |
0.993 |
66% |
|
501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Citizen
Survey |
Q602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where
would you go to get justice if something bad happened to
you? (3 most common responses) |
Traditional
Local arbiters |
State
Distict (courts) |
Nowhere |
State
Upazilla (Police) |
Sponsored
Local arbiters |
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Women |
53.8% |
23.5% |
8.7 |
8.5 |
0.5 |
609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Men |
54.2% |
19.1% |
22.0% |
2.7 |
1.1 |
591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interview
Responses |
(MIR) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most
common attitudes of people attending Village Court outside 3 VCs |
Time for case
to be resolved |
Associated costs BDT |
Consensus |
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 - 35 days |
BDT70 |
VC good alternative to police and court |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INFRASTRUCTURE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Court rooms |
Location |
Number of court
rooms |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DSC |
Gopalganj District HQ |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CJM |
Gopalganj District HQ |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate
furthest distance to district HQ from within district |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KM |
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hours drive |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associated costs BDT at: |
Village Courts |
Shalish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 - 70 |
0 -300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RESOURCES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
budget DS and CJM Courts2012/13 |
31914500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magistrates per 100000 |
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Judges per
100000 |
0.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total village courts |
|
no data but corresponds w number UP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Village
courts with |
Ejlas |
no data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Village
courts with |
Village Court Assistant |
no data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASE PROCESSING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Practitioner
Survey |
(PSR) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most common characterization of formal
justice processes from practitioners at CJM courts |
Av
no. adjournments per case |
Main
reason for adjournments |
Av
time to complete trial |
Proportion
of trials ending in a guilty plea |
Proportion
of offences compounded |
proportion
of false cases |
proportion
accused rep by lawyer |
any
pre-trial review to expdite case disposal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
witness not present |
1
-2 years |
very
few |
less
than 50% |
many |
all |
no
but would be helpful |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Practitioner
Survey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most common characterization of formal
justice processes from practitioners at DS courts |
Av
no. adjournments per case |
Main
reason for adjournments |
Av
time to complete trial |
Proportion
of trials ending in a guilty plea |
Proportion
of offences compounded |
proportion
of false cases |
proportion
accused rep by lawyer |
any
pre-trial review to expdite case disposal |
local
co-ordination mechanism for justice actors to meet regularly to discuss local
justice situation |
proportion
of accused who are women |
most
common crimes of which women accused |
|
|
|
Between
25 and 50 |
non
attendance of witness |
more than 2 years |
very
few |
no data |
some |
all |
no
but would be helpful |
yes,
facilitated by Madaripur Legal Aid Association |
5% |
narcotics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Practitioner
Survey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most common attitudes among witnesses and accused |
prior
attendances at court |
distances
travelled |
costs to attend |
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
to 35 |
up to 70 km |
245 - 3,000 |
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of pending cases of more than five years old end 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CJM court |
217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DS court |
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOScourt |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cases
per magistrate /judge in 2012 |
CJM |
2066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DS
Judge |
11742 |
civil and criminal cases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOS Judge |
669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Av cases per month |
CJM |
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DS
Judge |
979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NoS |
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
cases carried over from 2012 caseload |
CJM 2012 |
42.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DSC
2012 |
55.8% |
criminal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81.4% |
civil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOS 2012 |
85.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pending
cases growth rate end 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CJM |
8.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DSC |
51.2% |
Data note |
SC data provides 340% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOS |
27.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Practitioner Survey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Village
courts |
|
|
|
|
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interview with VC member and administration |
%
applicants women |
Time
for case disposal |
Average
monthly caseload |
Decision
implemented |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
more than 50% |
1-2 hours |
4 - 5 per month |
60-100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Practitioner
survey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most
common attitudes of people attending Village Court outside 3 VCs |
Time
for case to be resolved |
Associated costs BDT |
Consensus |
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
days - 5 weeks |
BDT70 |
VC good alternative to police and court |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shalish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
applicants women |
Time
for case disposal |
Average
monthly caseload |
Average
cases resolved per month |
Maintain
settlement agreed |
Most
common resolution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
- 40% |
under
1 month |
ten
to 40 |
2
- 15 cases |
75
- 95% |
Restitution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Governance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Practitioner Survey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal supervision mechanism for courts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CJM court |
regular
supervision by DS Judge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DS court |
no data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Citizen Survey |
Q208g |
|
Q509 & 517n |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHALISH |
N |
Formal court Victims and accused |
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yes neutral process |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Women |
72.6% |
62 |
87.5% |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Men |
87.1% |
194 |
63% |
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Citizen Survey |
Q208c |
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHALISH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There was at least one female shalishkar? |
Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Women |
3.2 |
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Men |
4.6 |
194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|