|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Citizen
Survey |
Q601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you
something bad happened to you, do you think you would get justice? |
Women |
N |
Men |
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
77.2% |
606 |
69.7% |
594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Citizen Survey |
Q501 |
Q301 |
Q201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Have never
used |
Formal court |
Village court |
Shalish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Women |
97.4% |
99.8% |
98.1% |
606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Men |
82.5% |
98.7% |
78.8% |
594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Citizen
Survey |
Q602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where
would you go to get justice if something bad happened to you? (3 most common
responses) |
Traditional
Local arbiters |
State
Distict (courts) |
Nowhere |
State
Upazilla (Police) |
Sponsored
Local arbiters |
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Women |
58.7% |
22.1% |
11.6% |
5.3% |
0.3 |
606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Men |
62.4% |
16.2% |
16.2% |
3.5% |
0.2 |
594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INFRASTRUCTURE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Court
rooms |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location |
Number
of court rooms |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DSC |
Rangpur
District HQ |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CJM |
Rangpur
District HQ |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate
furthest distance to district HQ from within district |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KM |
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hours drive |
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associated
costs BDT at: |
Village Courts |
Shalish |
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
no
data |
civil 4 taka
criminal 2 taka |
2 Shalishkar |
Data Note: these are the same as
set VC costs. Shalishkar interviewed are also members of VC panel and UP. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RESOURCES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
budget DS and CJM courts 2012/13 |
42437300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magistrates per 100000 |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Judges per
100000 |
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total village courts |
|
no data but corresponds w number UP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Village
courts with |
Ejlas |
no data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Village
courts with |
Village Court Assistant |
no data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASE PROCESSING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Practitioner
Survey |
(PSR) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most common characterization of formal
justice processes from practitioners at CJM courts |
Av
no. adjournments per case |
Main
reason for adjournments |
Av
time to complete trial |
Proportion
of trials ending in a guilty plea |
Proportion
of offences compounded |
proportion
accused rep by lawyer |
any
pre-trial review to expdite case disposal |
local
co-ordination mechanism for justice actors to meet regularly to discuss local
justice situation |
proportion of
accused who are women |
most common
crimes of which women accused |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
to 50 |
witness not present |
Wide
range from 18 months to 10 years |
very
few |
2
- 3% |
all |
unclear |
some
practitioners indicated that there is such a mechanism |
5 to 10% |
narcotics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most common characterization of formal justice
processes from practitioners at DS courts |
Av no.
adjournments per case |
Main reason for
adjournments |
Av time to
complete trial |
Proportion of
trials ending in a guilty plea |
Proportion of
offences compounded |
proportion
accused rep by lawyer |
any pre-trial
review to expdite case disposal |
local
co-ordination mechanism for justice actors to meet regularly to discuss local
justice situation |
proportion of
accused who are women |
most common
crimes of which women accused |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Between 10 and 25 |
witness
not present |
up to 3 years |
very
few |
none |
all |
unclear |
some
practitioners indicated that there is such a mechanism |
5% |
narcotics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of pending cases of more than five years old end 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CJM court |
2056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DS court |
644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOS court |
2167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cases
per magistrate /judge in 2012 |
CJM |
1846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DS
Judge |
329.3076923 |
Data Note |
DS Judges also deal with civil cases, but no
data available for these, so this figure is based on the total amount of
criminal cases and does not include the Special Court |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NoS |
4764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Av cases per month |
CJM |
153.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DS
Judge |
27.44230769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NoS |
397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
cases carried over from 2012 caseload |
CJM 2012 |
74% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DSC
2012 |
75% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOS 2012 |
93% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pending
cases growth rate end 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CJM |
1.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DSC |
-15.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOS |
11.5% |
Data note |
Supreme Court data: 22% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Practitioner Survey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Village
courts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Views of
practitioners at
VCs |
%
applicants women |
Time
for case disposal |
Average
monthly caseload |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
more than 50% |
1 - 2 hours |
5 to 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Practitioner
Survey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shalish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
applicants women |
Average
monthly caseload |
Average
cases resolved per month |
Maintain
settlement agreed |
Most
common resolution |
|
|
50% |
15
- 16 |
14
- 15 cases |
100% |
Compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GOVERNANCE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Practitioner Survey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal supervision mechanism for courts |
yes |
no |
what |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CJM court |
no data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DS court |
y |
|
Inspector visits
subordinate courts on a regular basis Sometimes Judges from the Supreme Court
visit subordinate courts as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Citizen Survey |
Q208g |
|
Q509 & 517n |
|
|
|
|
|
SHALISH |
|
Formal court Victims
and accused |
|
|
|
|
yes neutral process |
|
N |
|
N |
|
|
|
Women |
73.6% |
47 |
100% |
5 |
|
|
|
Men |
82.9% |
187 |
88.23% |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Citizen Survey |
Q208c |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHALISH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
There was at least one female shalishkar |
|
N |
|
|
|
|
|
Women |
5.7% |
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
Men |
1.6% |
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|